Sunday, May 9, 2010

The end of this blog

Over the past semester this blog has served as a forum for my opinions, news stories, and a wide array of class-assigned posts; but like all good things it must come to an end--kind of. This blog on Iran and Technology has run its course. I enjoyed writing greatly and feel that I have benefited from it as well. It was nice to see how my thoughts developed over the course of the semester. I think at the beginning I shied away from some topics and statements but recently I have become more assertive in what I have to say about the situation in Iran and its governing and influencing forces. More importantly it has fascinated me as to how technology has affected their situation--how it has allowed for a grassroots movement to not only establish a popular widespread base, but also to sustain itself in the following months. As I wrote towards the end of my last post, these people have used technology in a way that most Americans have not. They used twitter to spread the cause of democracy--we've used it to report on Maryland Day; YouTube for them is a their battle cry--for us its a place to post videos about skateboarding bull dogs. In Iran, Facebook (when its accessible) is less of a place to check out vacation pics than a place to find out when and where the next round of protests would occur.

No matter what, regular posting on this blog will stop in the coming weeks. I will be hindered from continuing my regular posting: between school work and employment and my summer plans it will be tough to keep going with this blog. If there is one thing I hope to continue it is blogging. This topic will prove to be hard to keep up with this summer as I am participating in the Persian Undergraduate Flagship Program in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. I think this project has allowed me to put my thoughts down on paper (or webpage). I plan to keep my friends and family posted on my goings-on through blogging and I feel greatly prepared to do that. After that I'm not sure where my blogging will go--but I know that I have left this class with a newly acquired skill. I thank my professors, classmates, family, and anyone who gave their input--either publicly or directly to me. As previously said: this has been incredibly enriching and engaging encounter for me.

And along with this final post is my final "thousand word" segment. It is Dr. Seuss's take on the Iran protests. The Iranian government does not want the Green Movement to exist at all--in any venue (not even in twitter, maybe more so than anywhere else). Take a read. And thanks again.



(Source:http://www.flickr.com/photos/30707740@N04/3645572910/sizes/l/in/set-72157620026952964/)

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Why the Iranian government is scared of facebook. .

Mir Hossein Mousavi, a leader of the Iranian Green movement has a facebook page (and was also named to Time Magazine's 100 most influential people of 2010). While facebook is blocked in Iran (along with Google and a few others) Mousavi still boasts a following of over 125,000 followers on the social networking site. Mousavi doesn't run the site himself but has relegated responsibility over it to Mohammad Sadeghi--an German-Iranian living outside of Iran. Sadeghi also manages the facebook site of Mousavi's wife, Zahra Rahnavard (also on Time's 100 list). The two have utilized social networking sites for some time now--Sadeghi said he christened Mousavi's page the before President Obama's inauguration.

I found the article regarding Mousavi's facebook site on a blog site called Global Voices (it may sound familiar because there is a live feed from their site on the right-hand side of this website). The site interviewed Mr. Sadeghi about his work, his opinions on the elections, and his thoughts on citizen journalism among other things. They ask Sadeghi about the impacts of citizen journalism in Iran--if it has slowed in recent months, if it helped Mousavi. Sadeghi responded as follows, "I would summarize the impact of Mousavi’s Facebook group as a 'process innovation' to incorporate existing social network platforms into the Persian language media bandwidth...[a] second revolution in my opinion has been initiated by Mr Mousavi who called for 'citizen staffs' and hence the automatized use of a wide range of suppressed potential for fundamental change. This decentralized campaign had the opportunity to exploit a wide range of communication methods - as the very tool of a campaign- while working out a consensus for a model of change. The Facebook page initiated and evolved the process of information by transforming the campaign into a non-political atmosphere of social networks" (Source)

Sadeghi is a believer in the power of the PC. It is no secret how much the internet has helped this movement sustain itself even while it has confronted threats and acts of violence, a decentralized leadership, and a whole gamut of other obstacles. The internet's effects on post-election Iran is both undeniable and immeasurable. We value the internet in the US because it lets us stay in touch with our family and friends, check news and scores, etc.; but Iranians have taken things like twitter and facebook--social networking sites that here in the US are pretty trivial and even causes of social development or interactive issues in teens--and have turned them into an all-powerful weapon of mass construction. The Green Movement is lives thru facebook posts, text messages, and YouTube videos. My first "thousand word post" was of a man threatening a violent mulla with the statement "Stop or I'll tweet!" People laugh and remark "how interesting" it is, but the power of that cartoon is not in its hilarity but in its truth. These thug basijis and mullas are running scared--they are terrified of the Iranian people for their ability publicize their crimes and abuses. People like Muhammad Sadeghi are criminals in Iran because of they expose the actions of the government and bolster the opposition. Sadeghi and his associates are prime examples of fine journalists--and more importantly the prime examples of the Iranian regime's worst nightmare.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

More coverage of the protests

The LA Times tweeted it had videos of this weekend's events in Iran. Their report states that protests occurred throughout Iran. One instance in small town in the Iranian countryside unemployed citizens clashed with police when they threatened the cops with machetes and sticks.

You can a look at some of the videos and content that the LA Times posted online. I posted one of them before (its one from students protesting Ahmadinejad at Tehran U) but the others are new and pretty good. Quality is iffy because, as in the past, they were taken on mobile devices. Green Iranians now videotape protests or security forces or events by starting to record video and then put the phone to their ear as if they are talking.

They are as resourceful as they are brave.

Protests continue in Iran

The visibility of Iran-related stories on the news seems to have gone down in recent months, (in spite of the fact that foreign media are allowed in once again) spurring a lot of people to think the Green Movement is over and done with. People seem to forget that this is not a single-issue group--they are not so concerned with the election fraud as they are with their civil rights. The Green Movement wants nothing more than a realization of democracy and civil liberties as promised in the constitution that was ratified after the 1979 revolution.

Just yesterday on International Worker's Day, or Ruze Kargar in Persian people across the country--as has been the habit for some time now--protested, perhaps not as vocally as on previous days, but they were absolutely out. Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi called for labor groups to join the Greens in protest against the government. NY Times correspondent Nazila Fathi wrote yesterday how things did not go as planned. Tehran was reportedly packed with security forces as to deter any potential protestors. This video shows security forces are out in strength in Tehran. This one was taken at Tehran University where students protests an appearance by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Keep an eye on Iran because the next month or so promises to be intense, with the one year anniversary of June 12 Election approaching. Any thoughts on where it will go?

Saturday, April 24, 2010

100 people = the world

Today Nicholas Kristof, Nobel Prize-winning columnist for the New York Times, retweeted a website that breaks down the world in a simplified manner. If the world were made up of 100 people who would have what? How many people follow what faith? How many people would have access to clean air or water? How many people are literate? Etc.

Please do take a look at it. It is an informative and eye-opening collection of graphics.

The graphic below pertains to a topic that is personally very important to me. There are 25 more on the site. If your bored or want to see some pretty cool infromation take a look.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Reporters Without Borders awards Iranian Blogger

This year Reporter's Without Borders awarded Iranian blogger and women's rights activist Jila Bani Yaghoob with a freedom of expression award. Her blog, We Are Reporters can be read in both Persian and in English. Bani Yaghood and her husband were arrested in June after the fraudulent election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Reporters Without Borders writes of Bani Yaghood: "Her Persian-language blog deals with the news in Iran, social issues and the subject of women. Jila is in the forefront of the struggle for freedom of expression in her country. She and her family have already paid a high price for her commitment. Reporters Without Borders is proud to award her this prize and through her pay tribute to all Iranian bloggers and journalists who have been arrested, imprisoned for driven into exile these past months" (Source). You can read a full transcript of their announcement here.

Interview w/Dr. Nahal Akbari @ GWU Iran Blogosphere Conference

This audio file is of an interview I conducted with Dr. Nahal Akbari of the University of Maryland on Monday April 12. Dr. Akbari attended the blogosphere conference at GW and was kind enough to let me interview her about her thoughts on the use of technology and blogs in Iran. Dr. Akbari regularly monitors the goings on of Iran through multiple news sources--blogs, BBC Persian, newspapers from inside and outside of Iran, and NPR among others. Dr. Akbari is not a regular user of social networking sites like Facebook or Twitter but does think that they can be useful. Definitely take a listen to what she has to say.

You can hear it here (give it a second or two to load).

Thursday, April 15, 2010

One more thing. . .

One more thing from Dr. Dabashi's website: The video below is in Persian but talks about Israeli cinema. They focus on two Israeli films: "Lebanon" and "Waltz with Bashir." Each film is about Israel's war in Lebanon during the 1980's. It is really fascinating and was unexpected when I first watched the video; I was surprised they were talking about it Israeli film.

It's really cool. If you speak Persian or just want to watch I high encourage you to do so.

Iranian scholarship and multimedia

Similar to George Washington University's conference on the use of technology in today's Iran, Columbia will be hosting "New Generation, New Perspectives, New Media." The event is taking this Saturday April 17th. I wish I could go because there are some great Iran scholars up at Columbia, one of whom, Dr. Hamid Dabashi, I wrote about a few weeks back in Reading List 2.

Dr. Dabashi has a section on his website that features a segment called "Week in Green." "Week in Green" features short clips of Dr. Dabashi covering relevant events or talking with Iranian scholars and figureheads, like Dr. Ervand Abarahimian or reformist cleric Mohsen Kadivar. Most of the clips are in Persian and do have English subtitles so if you are interested in seeing how one of the foremost minds on Iran has utilized multimedia, check out some of the videos.

Also Dr. Babashi has a facebook page, youtube channel, and twitter account--check them all out.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Inside Iran

Great website that encourages internet usage/assistance to Iranians: Inside Iran

This site/organization is run by a panelist from today's conference, Geneive Abdo.

Panel 2

The second panel of the day is focusing its discussion around the matter of engagement. These panelists have emphasized how Internet can be a tool for cross cultural exchange and how the internet can be used to fight the oppressive tactics of the Iranian regime. While the internet is a great tool for helping generate dialogue "it does not replace face to face contact," says panelist Sonya Reines.

From Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement @ GWU

Azar Nafisi

Ms. Azar Nafisi just finished her fantastic keynote speech
From Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement @ GWU

Watch the Iran's Blogosphere Conference live now

Watch the conference live here

Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement @ GWU

Just got to GWU a short while ago. Here's a quick look at the pre-conference set up and program.

From Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement @ GWU


From Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement @ GWU


From Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement @ GWU

Sunday, April 11, 2010

New feature

I just discovered a great blog called Global Voices.Started in 2005, it features blogs from all over the world and is translated into 15 languages. They have more than 200 bloggers working for their site worldwide "who work together to bring you translations and reports from blogs and citizen media everywhere, with emphasis on voices that are not ordinarily heard in international mainstream media." (Source: Global Voices - About)

Their expressed goals are to:
- Call attention to the most interesting conversations and perspectives emerging from citizens’ media around the world by linking to text, photos, podcasts, video and other forms of grassroots citizens’ media.
- Facilitate the emergence of new citizens’ voices through training, online tutorials, and publicizing the ways in which open-source and free tools can be used safely by people around the world to express themselves.
- Advocate for freedom of expression around the world and protect the rights of citizen journalists to report on events and opinions without fear of censorship or persecution.
(Source: Global Voices - About)

What is great about Global Voices is that they allow readers, like me, who have a website or a blog to post a newsfeed to their respective site. In an effort to broaden the information on this page and expand my blog's multimedia capabilities I have added to the right side of my blog a newsfeed of Global Voice's Iran headlines. So whenever anything happens on their site pertaining to Iran, it happens here too.

Enjoy!

A picture is worth a thousand words. . .

For this week's thousand word picture here is a cartoon by renowned Iranian cartoonist Nikahang Kowsar. Mr. Kowsar will be a speaker at GW's "Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement." Usually his work is in Persian but I was able to find this one in English. Similar to one of my first thousand-worders this one plays off of Tianemen Square and emphasizes the use of technology in the Iranian protests.



(Source: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Znc6n3fd3fQ/S79TO7dAN6I/AAAAAAAAAPY/ieIunRkyO28/s1600/Nikahang.jpg)

Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement

This Monday morning (tomorrow) I will be attending a conference on Iran's Blogosphere at George Washington University. The conference,
"Iran's Blogosphere and Grassroots Voices: Risks and Rewards of Engagement" promises to be greatly engaging and informative, as many excellent speakers, including Iran author and scholar Zar Nafisi (who wrote a superb book called "Reading Lolita in Tehran") will be in attendance.

I plan on keeping both my blog and Twitter well-updated throughout the day so keep an open eye. Also if you are interested in following the conference live you can watch it streaming online here. Check out the conference facebook page and twitter too.

It will be a great time.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Additional Photos of Campus Iranians

Here are some original photos of mine from Iranians on campus. They were taken on by the camera on my phone so please excuse the poor quality. Nonetheless enjoy.

From iranians @ UMD


From iranians @ UMD


From iranians @ UMD


You can also check them out on my very first Picasa photo album. More pictures are on the way.

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Visualizations of Iran

Aside from the content that I have posted from local events here in Maryland here are some photos that I found on Flickr through the website Creative Commons. The pictures below are depictions of events that have occurred in Iran in the last nine months. Some of them are political illustrations created in response to the regime's criminal actions. Others are photographs of the protests.

Also check out this great website, Sabz Photo ("Sabz" is Persian for "green"). It is a superb site that regularly posts high quality photos--sometimes artistic, sometimes not. It is an endless bank of photos relating to the Green Movement. Take a moment to take a look at it.


(Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/arasmus/3629543561/)


(Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/hamed/3636927440/)


(Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/harrystaab/3653879028/)

Photos from Nowruz

I want to first and foremost thank my classmate Sahar for giving me permission to use some of her photos from Nowruz. These are hers and she very graciously let me use them, knowing that they were relevant to my blog--so thank you, Sahar-jan!

These are just a small sampling of the unreal time that was Friday night.





ISF's Nowruz 1389 Celebration

Hello again.

Our most recent class assignment requires that we being to incorporate relevant multimedia into our blogs. Over the last few weeks I have tried my best to involve content beyond just plain text--most specifically found in my "one thousand word" posts and links. It's time to take it to the next level. As basic and essential as text is to a quality blog or publication, the most advanced news sources have begun to include audio and video into their output. While many go as far as to include viewer-produced content others like the NY Times will not put articles online without some sort of interactive video or chart to supplement the article. Maybe taking it a step further CNN has a segment called iReports which is composed of viewer generated material. My point is that multimedia is the new media; instead of just getting an article they give you that and then some. It's awesome.

For my topic, Iran and Tech, its a little tougher than I'd like to generate original content from Iran. So with Prof. Yaros's permission I will begin posting some content regarding Iran that occur on campus. Hopefully in the near future it will be easier to go to Iran and post and publish the facts without fear of being arrested--but until then I'll be covering whats going on here at Maryland. The first of such goings-on is from this past Friday.

On Friday night the Iranian Student's Foundation (ISF) hosted its annual Nowruz celebration. It was a great time to say the least. They hosted over 250 guests from around the Washington DC Metro area as well as students--both heritage and non. As in years past, this years event was held in the Grand Ballroom at Stamp and was decked out with lights, dance stage, and ridiculous food spread. Below are some videos of the awesome time it was. I apologize ahead of time for the poor sound quality--between the DJ's really loud speakers and my crappy phone it wasn't easy. But nonetheless here is the first series of multimedia on Iran and Iranians at the University of Maryland. If nothing more this should serve as a glimpse in to life at Maryland and its incredibly vibrant and awesome Iranian community.

Enjoy!





Thursday, March 25, 2010

A Happy YouTube Nowruz

A few days ago Iranians all over the world celebrated the Persian New Year, Nowruz. Nowruz literally means "new day" ("now"=new "ruz"=day) and is the first day of the spring season and emphasizes new beginnings and hopes for good days ahead. Many Iranians celebrate the holiday by gathering with family and friends and eating really, really good food.

In the hopes of creating a dialogue with the government of Iran and goodwill with her people, President Obama posted online an unprecedented New Year's video message. Never before had any US official--let alone president--offered such greetings to the Islamic Republic since 1979. He offered an open hand and dialogue to the Iranian regime and expressed hopes for a bright and open future between the two nations.

This year President Obama has sent another Nowruz message to the leaders and people of Iran. Again, the president expressed his hope for cultural exchange and understanding, hoping to somehow find common ground on the big issues--Iran's nuclear program and human rights violations. Obama also emphasized his desire to provide all Iranians opportunity to open access to information and internet. Unfortunately, in his own Nowruz message Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rebuffed Obama's offer, continuing the trend of ignoring pretty much anything anyone from the West has to offer. It is terribly unfortunate that Iran's government chooses to further isolate itself from the rest of the world, on top of brutally oppressing Iranian citizens.

The internet has proven a valuable tool for the Obama administration in its efforts to reconstruct the US's reputation around the world, especially with regard to its Iran policy.. The president ran his campaign knowing full well the powers of the internet--it is not a mistake: he recognizes that it is a growing force--one key to the spread of democracy and free society.

A picture is worth a thousand words. . .

This week's thousand-word post (like the other ones) speaks for itself pretty much. I'm posting it now in light of post about Neda Agha-Soltani. Her death and that of all the other Iranians were not in vain. They have and will continue to unite the people in their struggle for democracy, civil rights, and free society.




Source: http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/iran/ig/Iran-Cartoons/Iranian-Protests.0QQX.htm

Iran and Israel over Spring Break. . .and communication (?!)

For my Spring Break I traveled and spent time in Israel. I left a little early in order to spend a little extra time with my brother who is there studying for the year (he's in Rabbinical school and its a requirement that all students spend at least one year studying in Jerusalem). It was great to see him; he and I have become much closer over the years and it was great to see him again. Nonetheless the focus of the trip was to visit graduate schools in Jerusalem (Hebrew University) and in Tel Aviv (Tel Aviv University), specifically I was there checking out Iranian Studies programs. Both schools are fantastic and unique--Hebrew University specializes in language and literature while Tel Aviv University specializes in the political and historical side of Iran.

I sat in on a few clases at both schools but at Hebrew University there was a class I sat in on called Persian Media. The class was held in Hebrew but the reading was in Persian. Aside from finding Persian with a Hebrew accent to be very strange, I also found it incredible that Iranian news sources were readily available in Israel. What made it so was. . . the internet of course! Was I surprised? Not particularly because many of my teachers use printed articles or sources from the internet all the time, but it still surprised me to see it there. It made me think about the shift from paper to electric sources--the stuff we're learning about in JOUR289I. Take the current situation between Israel and Iran: overt diplomatic ties are and have been dead for decades (nonetheless they still existed; if you'd like to know more take a look at a book called "Treacherous Alliance" by Trita Parsi) and I doubt they'll restart soon, either. But in spite of this the internet allowed the very kind and hospitable professor from Hebrew University search, print, and provide resources for her class on the Persian-speaking media (it was not exclusively restricted to Iran--one of the articles pertained to Tajikistan and another to Afghanistan, both of which are Persian-speaking). If there were no internet there is not way any sort of cultural exchange would have occurred. This use of the internet flies in the face of the ignorant assumptions made by each country makes about the other. Now people are reading, learning, and finding out for themselves.

I'm happy to see this goes beyond just studying material and leaks into regular exchange of information between people. The people of Iran and Israel are more similar than they think: they both are generally well educated, both love eating meat, and at times the religious people in their respective countries badger and push the general society more than they like. An electronic exchange of information would do the two populations some good. It would take away a little bit of the credibility of the stupid and dangerous political saber-rattling going on right now.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

The Murder Seen Around the World

I would like to start this post by thanking my classmate Sahar for suggesting I cover this topic in my blog. Also please note that many of the videos linked below are violent.

The events of post-election Iran were vastly affected by the use of the internet. One of the most infamous internet videos from the protests was the filmed death of Neda Agha-Soltani. On the evening of June 20th, just eight days after election day, at a time when millions of other Irans flooded the streets in protest of the fraudulent elections, Neda Agha-Soltani, accompanied by her music teacher was walking through the streets of Tehran. It was then and there that she was shot in the chest. Ms. Agha-Soltani died moments after being shot, a spectacle seen the world over because of a video taken by nearby witness. The video is violent and painful to watch; but it galvanized millions of people from within Iran and without. Everyone witnessed the shamelessness and brutality of the Iranian government forces. The death of this young woman was a watershed moment in the life of the protest movement. It was the single most significant use of the internet in the short existence of the Green movement. While many videos that were posted showed basij and government forces beating, wounding and arresting protestors, this video was the most powerful of all. Many others had already surfaced (like this one and this) but Neda's death was starkly brutal and soon became a rallying point for the supporters of the Green movement. Her death was such a threat to the government they have spent the last few months scrambling for responses to the ordeal. They have desecrated her grave, prevented her family from conducting the proper burial and mourning rights; they even imprisoned her fiance for over two months. They have also blamed foreign agents (a regular go-to for these scumbags) in a documentary aired in January on state-run Press TV.

Just like many other people, this video is hard for me to watch. It is terrifying and cold. It represents all that is wrong and all that is evil in Iran. What makes it harder to watch is the disgusting report filed on Press TV. I am made sick and deeply angered by that video. It is such an affront to common sense and more importantly to this woman's life and death.

This horrible, horrible incident unfolded in front of the entire world because of the incident: the protests, the bloody murder of Neda, the bloody beatings and murders of countless other Iranians, and also, unfortunately, the despicable and self-obsessed videos from the Iranian government. At the same time that the internet has helped spread the cause of democracy for Iran and awareness of the crimes against the people, it still helps convey the desperate message of the regime.

I say desperate because their banning of proper burial rights and defamation of her family (just to name a few) are prime examples of a lost and misguided leadership. These people are scared; they know they have committed crimes but they do not care what they do as long as the remain in power--that is their central goal. Their survival is the primary objective and that only makes them more dangerous.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Forgot a big one!

One more thing before I go to bed.

I forgot to post this when I first read it about a week ago and I just re-stumbled across it. "Bombard Iran...with broadband" was published in The Guardian in late February by Reza Zia-Ebrahimi. It is one of the best articles I've read regarding the fight for democracy in Iran, and it related directly to US involvement in the ordeal. It was so good I was inspired to write my Congressional representatives and I hope you do the same.

This article suggests the US not bombard the Islamic Republic with sanctions but with internet service! Genius! All freedom-loving people of the world want the freedom-loving people of Iran to have a fighting chance and if the US were to hook them up (no pun intended) with some internet it would be a huge boost to the Green efforts. This is directly related to my topic of Iran and Technology, and it is so important that this approach be used. Please, please read this piece and write your local, state, and federal (here for US Senate, here for House of Reps.) representatives; write your friends and tell them to write their reps. This is a great step towards civil rights for the Iranian people.

Please help these good people.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

International Women's Day

Today was International Women's Day and the Center for Persian Studies held a conference at Van Munching Hall in honor women in the arts. They hosted five wonderfully talented female Iranian artists who put on display their magnificent talents. It was held in Persians so it was tough to follow at times but I found it greatly rewarding. I also found this. It is a collection of a few cartoons from the early 20th century depicting Iranian women. Pretty accurate as to how Iranian women were treated. The situation has improved in many rights but women are still 2nd class citizens in Iran. If you are interested in this topic and would like some more info please read my previous post on Women in Iran.

The relation between the Green Movement and College Park (Pt. 1)

When the Terps won the other day against Duke I was ecstatic. A lot of other students were also really excited, enough so to revel in downtown College Park—shutting down traffic, setting a few things on fire, and subsequently causing the Prince George’s County police to show up in full riot gear. The events of March 3rd were hardly anything more than a knee-jerk reaction to the joy in beating one the most hated teams in college sports—there was no deep message beyond the expression of the student body’s jubilance. On the other hand the protests in Iran are a stunning display of an assertion of democratic rights and free society by a genuine movement of the people. It’s not too hard to point out the extreme differences between the two showings. The members of the Green Wave have been beaten, arrested, tortured, and murdered in their efforts to establish a freer society; here in College Park a handful of students were arrested for setting a John Scheyer jersey ablaze and other forms of disorderly conduct (which may or may not have included a few expletives aimed at Duke and its players). While my dislike for Mr. Scheyer is undeniable, I’m not going to discuss this specific or any other incidents. Rather I want to re-express my solidarity with the Iranian people. I personally appreciate the freedoms that I have as citizen of the United States so much more in light of their struggle, and I truly and dearly hope to see them achieve their dreams of free society. What has brought on this renewed sense of empathy, you ask?

The answer: the College Park riots of 2010.

I went straight home right after the game—I had work, and it was already late. After I was done I texted a friend and asked where he was (something protesting Iranians cannot do, as cellular phone service is severely restricted, especially in the days leading up to protests). He said he was heading back soon—he wasn’t trying to get pepper sprayed. Legitimate sentiment. But I wanted to see what was going on because I’d heard it was nuts. So I grabbed my bike, a notepad, and my cell phone and bolted over to Route 1 by the Maryland Book Exchange. What I saw was a mass of students being slowly shepherded onto campus. I also saw a number of students get beat, pepper sprayed, shot with bean bag rounds and paintball guns.

It was pretty scary stuff. I won’t get into who was right or wrong but I’ll say this: it is horrifying to have a gun of any kind pointed at you. Moreover riot police are intimidating guys. That’s their job. Having witnessed the post-game gathering on Route 1, I can say that I know something (albeit very little compared to the Greens) about being intimidated and threatened. It is not a good feeling—it is a terrifying feeling; when What’s almost as bad is when trying to get a logical explanation from the authorities after they beat and arrest a 20-year old college student (regardless of where you are), you are threatened with “Shut up or I’ll arrest you” or “Turn that fucking camera off.”

In the context of the Iran protests—where protestors were shot at with live rounds, beat by motorcycle riding thugs (who used anything from batons to chains), sprayed, arrested, and tried under penalty of death—I can only imagine how terrified these people must have been. More importantly though I can imagine how much they want their rights. And how much they deserve those rights. And how much the assholes (pardon my language) who attack them and beat them, should be punished.

What I saw is nothing compared to what the men and women of Iran must live through. No one in their right mind would suggest the vicious Basij forces of Iran are role models for the Prince George’s County riot police—that absolutely and totally absurd.

Saturday, March 6, 2010

Mobile Response (reading response assignment)

When i read the article "Cellphones in public: social interactions in a wireless era" by Lee Humphreys I felt like I was reading a standup comedy bit. A lot of the material was a collection of small observations like the "you ever notice. . ." comedy that Jerry Seinfeld would do. What makes a funny standup bit is the truth behind it. I think the article was absolutely indicative of people's tendencies when using their phones.

For instance, when I am with a friend who gets a call, I will usually look through the messages on my phone or try to distract myself in other ways. I also eavesdrop; not intentionally but there are always flash words that pull me into the conversation and I find myself "not paying attention" but at the same time listening carefully. I, like many of the respondents in the study, do acknowledge "the social norms of privacy and civil inattention" (Humphrey 818), and try to distract myself but still pay attention to whats happening.

What was probably most relatable about the reading was its discussion of being on the phone with a person respondents didn't want to speak to. If a conversation with a such a person runs on for too long I begin to make visible/audible indicators of frustration. Sometimes I'll make hand motions--i.e. eye-rolling, hand-spinning (as a sign to wrap it up)--or I'll start saying "alright" a lot in order to wind the conversation down.

With regard to circumstances other than those described in the article the most glaring one I can think of is sexting. I don't think anyone expected it to ever happen but the act of sending sexually explicit material via mobile device has become a serious issue in the United States. It has become more and more prevalent in recent years and as we discussed in class, it will be a pretty weird discussion for people to have with their kids.

This article was an accurate depiction of social tendencies when using cell phones. It's weird that we react the way we do to being shut out of conversations but at the same time enjoy the high-and-mighty power of determining who's call we will and won't answer. It just goes back to basic human reactions and feelings towards authority and vulnerability--it's always interesting stuff.

Reading list part 2

Hello again,

Regular posting will continue this week after some time off. The first thing I would like to post is a collection of the articles written by Dr. Muhammad Sahimi. As previosuly mentioned (and posted) Dr. Sahimi has been writing for Tehran Bureau, for a number of months now. His in depth analysis of the Iranian political landscape is practically unparalleled in both quality and frequency. TB has collected all the pieces he has written for them and put them here.

In an effort to help people wade through the mass of pages and articles I'd like to recommend a few articles. First and foremost the article titled "Turning Point: Where is the Green Movement Headed" is perhaps my favorite article written by the good doctor. It clearly and thoroughly discusses where the greens could be going, what they need to get done, and how they should do it. Definitely read that one. Secondly, "Why Ahmadinejad did not Win"--no need to really explain what this one is about. But also a fantastic and exacted deduction as to why/how the election was stolen.

Lastly, this article, called "Iran's Younger, Smarter Revolution," was written by Columbia University professor, Dr. Hamid Dabashi. Dr. Dabashi strays from the conventional idea that what is occuring in Iran is a revolution; instead Dr. Dabashi explains this a civil rights movement. While many Iranians may want a secular government, Dr. Dabashi suggests this is movement is not looking to overthrow the Islamic Republic, but really ensure that it grants the people many rights they were promised 31 years ago, but never received. My words do not do it justice, so please be sure to take a read.

That's it for now. There will be another post forthcoming talking about the protests and Iran and. . .the College Park riots (?) Stay tuned to find out.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

A picture is worth a thousand words. . .

Hey guys,

I took this week off from the more intense posting (thank you Prof. Yaros) but I wanted to at least post the 1000-word picture segment. I really enjoyed this one more than the others. It speaks a lot to the role of women in the democratic movements in Iran. If you haven't already, I encourage you to read my post below on women in Iran. There will be more content in the coming weeks regarding the role of women in Iran but for now enjoy lady liberty from Tehran.





source: http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/iran/ig/Iran-Cartoons/Lady-Liberty-in-Iran.0KI0.htm

Thursday, February 18, 2010

A picture is worth a thousand words. . .

For this week's thousand-word post I've chosen the following cartoon. It doesn't pertain to this week's theme of gender and race but it sure as hell speaks a lot to the usage of technology in Iran (namely since the elections)




(Source:http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/iran/ig/Iran-Cartoons/Iran-Citizen-Journalists.htm)

Women in Iran

Women in Iran are known to be more assertive than women in most other Islamic countries. Their beauty is surpassed only by their confidence and boldness. Since the early twentieth century when the first policies regarding the hijab, or scarf, have deprived Iranian women of a free, self-determined choice of fashion. This website features pictures of Iranian women protesting just after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. At that time those who didn't want to don the scarves were called prostitutes and were spat at. As in years prior women were forced to follow male-forged policy--like in 1979, as men sought to make them where scarves, or as was the case during the Shah's rule, when he sought to criminalize religious scarf-wearing. Today modesty police roam streets of Iranian cities. They publicly scold and ticket women in places like North Tehran, where the women have started a lipstick revolution and have commandeered scarf-wearing, turning it into more than just a fashion statement, but also a political one.

Dolls are no exception: Barbies are sold only through the black market as the Islamic Republic found the dolls Western and immodest--entirely inappropriate. Porochista Khakpour wrote a deeply insightful Op-Ed for the New York Times last March, titled "Islamic Revolution Barbie." In it she talks about how the IR raided stores and even pushed its own dolls--the more modest and Islamic "Barbie and Ken", Sara and Dara have stocked Iranian stores since 2002. Khakpour emphasized her dread of looking nothing like her Barbie dolls: "I even attempted to 'tan' Peaches ’n’ Cream Barbie’s skin for hours one day," she writes, "praying for her lotion-slathered skin to turn brown like mine, which it never did."

For years women have fought tenaciously for their rights--participating in countless movements, weathering arrests, beatings, and public castigation all for the sake of their desire for freer lives. The One Million Signatures campaign in Iran has been gathering signatures slowly but surely for years--signatures buttressing women's rights in the face of discriminatory Iranian laws (for instance, in Iran a women's testimony in court worth half that of a man's). Nobel laureate and Iranian lawyer Shirin Ebadi continues to fight for women's rights in Iran. In November 2009 her Nobel prize was confiscated by the Iranian police and her bank accounts were frozen. In the post election protests in Iran her sister was arrested. Nonetheless Ms. Ebadi is still visible and still vocal in her fight against the Iranian regime: just last week she called for diplomatic sanctions against the Iran government (she condemned economic sanctions "as hurting the Iranian people" -Reueters).

Many Iranian women have also found a role model in the recent elections. A PhD, the former chancellor of Alzahra University, former advisor to ex-president Mohammad Khatami, and wife of presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi,Zahra Rahnavard did something a woman had never done before in the Iranian political scene: be a presence. Ever-visible, she was vocal force in her husband's election efforts and many women related to her and supported her husband for it. She was the Michelle Obama of Iran, said the Huffington Post. She served as the newest stage in the evolution of the paradigm of the Iranian woman--a strong, intellectual, and vocal political participant.

A week ago Jean M. Geran of Foreign Policy magagzine wrote about the women of Iran in an article titled "The Women Behind the Green." Geran writes: "The Iranian women's movement has a proud history of fighting for women's rights and has been a driving force behind the green movement's push for reform." She continues saying, "Iranian authorities censor dozens of websites and blogs, especially those covering women's issues." As she notes at the end it is important to support the green movement in Iran, and I agree. But I say it is especially important to support those who have been fighting for democratic rights for over century: Iranian women


Here is some more great content about women in Iran:
CNN's "Women in Iran March Against Discrimination"
In 2008 interview Shirin Ebadi discusses the US's Iran Policy and women's rights
ABC News Coverage of the Lipstick Revolutiuon in the post-election period

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

The Huffington Post: Iran Social Media Facing Serious Obstacles

The Huffington Post covered the shutdown of Internet access--regular and through proxies (channels that let Iranians travel to forbidden sites)--on 22 Bahman (February 11).

It's a great article and discusses how twitter and facbook were shut down.

Take a read here

Monday, February 15, 2010

The Digital Divide in Race and Gender (Assigned Blog not Iran-related)

I read about the role of technology and its relationship to gender and race in the article "Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Gender, Race, and Information Technology Use." I wasn't too surprised by some of its findings while some that really stood out.

First, the article argued that technology has its positives and negatives. For instance, it stated, like my parents did, that video games may fry brain cells; or as the article more eloquently put it, lowered GPAs. But on the other hand a connection between the video games and math skills was found. They found that Internet usage could solidify social relationships in certain users while for other, more reticent users it could exacerbate isolation.


The article also pointed out a growing issue: cyberbullying. I've heard about it before and did a little background research. Cyberbullying is just what it sounds like: being mean online. The article noted it is occurring more frequently as youths connect more--through IMs, texts, facebook posts, etc. There is an anti-cyberbullying site and in it there is a description about what needs to be done to fight cyberbullying. It reads, "If [children] don’t allow the cyberbullies to use them...cyberbullying will quickly stop...and in the end, our children will be safer online and offline. We will have helped create a generation of good cybercitizens, controlling the technology instead of being controlled by it" (the Italics are mine). This addressed an issue we confronted earlier this semester in class. I think it is remarkable that the question of who-leads-who goes beyond innovation, and is starting to seep into the social world. It is also very scary.

Another thing that caught my eye was the racial divide in the use of technology. The article says, “even within income levels, there are race differences in home Internet access favoring Caucasian Americans” (Jackson et al. 438). The article specifically highlights the difference between races in the United States, as it reads:

Comparing African American and Caucasian American youth on global measures of self-esteem generally find no differences. However, when specific dimensions of self-concept are considered, Caucasian American youth score higher … on social and academic self-concept…whereas African American youth score higher on physical appearance self-concept (438)

The article also notes a disparity between dial-up and broadband users. It says that broadband users access more diverse sites and participate in more online activites. Moreover the authors say, “the rate of information and online literacy skills and uses will continue to accumulate differentially” (438). This means that a new digital divide will arise, one that isn’t based on access but instead is based on use.

As the article mentions in the discussion there are differences between race and gender in regard to technology use and self-perception, but not in “overall self-esteem” (439). The largest indicators were household-income and gender. Higher income youths had more access to technology; boys played more video games then girls and were more likely make purchases online. I can’t say I find these conclusions shocking, as they match what my previous ideas of technology use were. If one had access to a computer, one would use it; and the same goes for an X-Box 360.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Iran and Education - Assigned Blog

This week we were given the assignment of discussing the connection between technology and education, in relation to our topic. Thank you to Professor Yaros for finding and providing me a report filed by Bibi Eshrat Zamani, scholar of Education and Psychology at the University of Isfahan, in Iran. The article is titled "Successful implementation factors for using computers in Iranian schools during one decade (1995–2005)" and discusses the integration and usage of computers within the Iranian education system. One of Eshrat Zamani's goals is "to see what changes had been occurred [sic] during one decade."

Before I go any further here are some important facts about Iran's population: The CIA world factbook indicates that the median age in Iran is 27 (the median in the US is 36.7); that 77% of Iranians are literate; and Iran spends 5.1% of its GDP on education (the US spends 5.3%).

According to the publication, Iranian students have used computers since the late 1980s and today officials boast that most high school graduates are in some way computer literate. From 1995 to 2005 the number of schools within the city of Isfahan that had computer labs rose from seventeen to ninety-four. In 1995 89% of students did not have home computers; that number plummeted by 2005 to 38%. Over the same period of time students stated their primary use of home computers was for entertainment purposes; secondary usage centered around academics.

A disparity also exists in attitudes towards computer usage. Teachers and administrators did not enjoy computer as much as their pupils: "In 1995, 89% of the teachers and 91% of principals’ believed that using computers in education was a complex process. This percentage has been changed [sic] to 76% for teachers and 82% for principals in 2000 and 73% for teachers and 76% for principals in 2005." For educators knowledge of computers required extensive technical and language training: "According to teachers, using computers in classrooms need a lot of computer knowledge and experience including computer and IT literacy. In addition, they should have English proficiency in reading and writing computer menus and messages." The students though felt differently: "Average 63% of students liked computer practical classes, because they felt more freedom compared to other theoretical classes...[in 2005 an] average 58% of students did not like the content of computer studies courses, they were interested to learn more about application programs and Internet." Unfortunately the access to computers was not indiscriminate: in 2005 88% of boys surveyed had prior computer knowledge against only 45% of girls.

Going back to Eshrat Zamani's goal of examining the changes over the decade, there is clear evidence that usage has risen, as has reception of technology. As is seen all over the world, Iran's young people are leading the technological growth. Teachers and administrators seem increasingly receptive to the introduction of technology but at the same time they seem to be happy with traditional means of education. Students would be better prepared to teach courses than their teachers. But there is a matter that Iranian students must deal with that many others don't: politics. The study found that "81% of principals in the study in 1995, 2000 and 2005 stated that computer education in Iran has been depended on the political situation"--that if the ministry of education decided to cut funding or if the West tightened sanctions, access to technology would be adversely affected. Iranians, especially its younger population, are thirsty for access to the outside world, to free information and the increased usage of technology in their classrooms has absolutely helped them on the path toward this inalienable right.


Friday, February 12, 2010

Coverage of 22 Bahman

Hello again,

So yesterday was the thirty-first anniversary of the fall of Iranian monarchy and the creation of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The IR welcomed reporters to the official ceremonies held in Azadi Square in Tehran, but kept them fenced in and away from any other areas of the city. As you can see from the pictures from coverage by the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal the event was heavily stocked by bussed-in government supporters. Ahmadinejad made it clear that the day was about Iran's unrestrained nuclear future. The government went to great lengths to break up any and all protests, as well as keep those opposition forces out of Azadi Sqaure.

The New Republic, among other sites (i.e. Andrew Sullivan @ The Atlantic Monthly, Kimber's Iranlog, and a blog by the Mehdi Saharkhiz, son of imprisoned Iranian journalist) was live-blogging the events here . Tehran Bureau, my go-to site, reported in its preview to the protests that "A complex scheme is to be implemented in which the routes to the northern and eastern sides of Azadi Square, from where protesters customarily emerge, will be blocked for several kilometers in each direction. People trying to make their way to the square via those routes will be diverted away from the eyes of the international press, who will be confined to designated areas within the square" (Source: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2010/02/overview-reading-22-bahman.html).

If you'd like to see some videos from the streets of Tehran and other cities across Iran check out this collection, put together by TB. Seeing as the press was limited in its access, we once again learned the value of camera phones, twitter, and other tech, especially in the fight against tyranny and oppression.

This weeks reading list (not class assigned)

Hey guys,

This week has been a pretty tumultuous one in Iran. Along with some explanation of what's going on and why, I've provided some links that will definitely help you learn a thing or two about what's going down.

If you weren't following the news here's a quick breakdown. Yesterday was the thirty-first anniversary of the deposition of Mohammad Reza Shah (shah = king) at the hands of the Islamic Revolution. The Islamic Republic (IR) celebrated its anniversary while suppressing many thousands of opposition supporters, rallying for their civil and democratic rights--freedom of press, political expression, etc. It was on February 11th 1979 (Iranian calendar date of 22 Bahman 1358) that 2500 years of monarchal rule ended in Iran. The day was "supposed" to mark the beginning of a democratic (yet, Islamic) government. Things haven't exactly turned out as they were expected to.

Thirty-one years and 11 days ago Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini the spiritual and political leader of the Islamic Revolution returned to Iran from a fifteen year exile. The day Khomeini arrived was the first of what is now known as the Ten-Day Dawn, chronicled here by brilliant writer and self-made scholar of Iran, Muhammad Sahimi While Dr. Sahimi is actually a professor of engineering at the University of Southern California he, over the course of the last few months has posted numerous and incredibly well written articles--like why Ahmadinejad didn't actaully win and a very thorough piece about General Mohammad Ali Jafari, commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)--on TehranBureau.com, a site run by PBS. On the tenth day after his return, the Iranian army (after a failed attempt at a coup by higher ups) laid its weapons down and surrendered to Khomeini and his supporters. Even before Khomeini had arrived in Iran the army lost conscripts to the Revolution, as many soldiers no longer trusted the despotic rule of the Shah. That is what the Iranian people were supposed to be "celebrating" today.

Definitely give a read to some of the articles. I recommend all of them as each one provides strong insight and background to the current issues plaguing Iran. The article about the Ten-Days Dawn definitely helps shed some light on the most important and final days of '79 revolution; the article about Ahmadinejad's election fraud will, naturally, argue that he cheated (doing so with common sense and strong evidence); and lastly the article about the commander of the IRGC, General Jafari is very important because it explains the rise of one of the most important players in Iran's current political scene. Many experts are suggesting that the IRGC, Khamenei (not to be confused with Khomeini), and Ahmadinejad are running the country by way of dictatorial triumvirate. I wouldn't be surprised. Nonetheless I'm going to keep reading--I hope you do the same.

A picture is worth a thousand words. . .

This week's thousand-word picture is from one of my favorite editorial cartoonists out there: award-winning political cartoonist Mike Lukovitch.




Source: http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/iran/ig/Iran-Cartoons/Iran-Twitter-Revolution.0KHy.htm

Friday, February 5, 2010

Reading list

Hello again

So I'm going to start a new segment on this blog in an effort to publicize/introduce readings on Iran. There's a lot to read out there and I figured I could post some links here to consolidate some of the better ones. The purpose of this segment is to supplement the regular postings as they are very informative and well-written.

This first one is a fantastic piece about the direction in which the Green Movment is/could be heading. It's written by a wonderful writer named Muhammad Sahimi and wast posted on Tehran Bureuau, a website run by PBS that provides really strong and well-done material Here is a link to the piece.

Happy readings!

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

A picture is worth a thousand words. . .




Source: http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/y/m/2/stop-or-tweet.gif

The Candidates

In the 2005 elections Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then a largely unknown candidate and mayor of the capital city of Tehran, won in stunning fashion. Behind candidates [incumbent and political superstar] Ali Hashemi Rafsanjani and [cleric, former parliamentary speaker and notorious liberal] Mehdi Karroubi, Ahmadinejad came from behind to make the startling win. It was widely speculated [and for many, assumed] that the election was stolen. Eight years earlier, the liberal cleric Mohammad Khatami won the 1997 elections in a remarkable landslide. With the election of Khatami millions of Iranians expected a drastic shift in civil rights and liberties within Iran. Unfortunately they were wrong. Ayatollah Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran--aka the guy with the real power--closed newspapers and intimidated opposition forces with beatings and killings. It is not a stretch to suggest that it was with Khatami's attempts to initiate a liberal society in Iran, Khamenei and his crew opted to create an alternative political reality--one in which the Iranian public could "vote" for the right candidate. And that's how a holocaust-denier was "elected" in 2005.

2009 was pretty much the same thing but with one significant difference.

While Ahmadinejad "won" this election the campaign that was conducted differed drastically from that of previous years. This time around the candidates utilized technology both before and after the elections. The award for most prominent use of technology easily goes to Mir Hussein Mousavi. Mr. Mousavi followed the in the path of Howard Dean and Barack Obama, turning to online for grassroots organization and mobilization of supporters. The strength of the Green Movement is direct a result of vast network of communication constructed on the foundations of text messaging, emails, and facebook messages/posts. Mr. Mousavi himself had (and still has) his own website, an account on facebook (which has over 125,000 fans), twitter, delicious.com, a youtube channel in addition to an extensive Wikipedia page. His base in technology is so strong that I regularly read updates of Iran's goings-on through his facebook status updates. His facebook also posts pictures and videos of the candidate himself, sometimes appealing for help from the world or decrying the maltreatment of political prisoners.

It is no mistake that this movement is still alive: the potent blend of passion, dedication, and of course social networkign sites has allowed for democracy-seeking Iranians to sustain their fight.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Society or Technology? Who Leads? (Reading Response)

Instead of writing about the candidates and their usage of tech in the elections I am going to respond to our assigned readings regarding the relationship between society and technology, specifically related to Iran.

Professor Yaros asked an important question in class this past Thursday: Does society guide technology or does technology guide society? According to our readings there is no clear-cut answer—and I agree. I see this question as one seeking to address the origins of innovation. And yes, while human creation is innovation there is more to the question than just what begets what; what also must be considered are the guiding principles—the ethos (the spirit/essence/attitude of a society or culture)--of the technology. What may navigate the manner in which technologies are used in United States will inherently differ from the way in which they are utilized in China or Greece or Iran. Even within the Western world there is no uniform ethos—everyone's got an opinion.

Not only are there geographic/cultural differences. There are also differences in how technology was viewed in terms of time period. Today the "guardians" of technology are quite different from who they were in the 19th century. Today's tech world is very, very user-generated/user-dependent. According to "When Old Technologies Were New" it was the "electrical professionals" (scientists, electrical engineers, etc.) who led the way in the early days of technology. Their job was to "engineer, promote, improve, maintain and repair the merging technical infrastructure” (Marvin 9). Most significant was their societal standing. These were cultural elites who were determining the direction of technology. Today this situation is not vastly different—mostly well-educated, upper-middle class tech developers create websites; the socio-economic gaps are unconscionable to ignore. But as was explained in class there is no technology gap, but rather a participation gap. Anyone with a library card can access and alter content on the internet. With this widening of the content-generating audience the question of whether society leads technology sort of becomes clearer. In order to better discuss this matter I want to take a short look at the use of tech post-election Iran.

Without ruining any of my future posts/explanations of the situation in Iran, the world's knowledge of that situation is largely based on user-created content. Yes, the actual construction of websites facebook and twitter required professionals but the people of Iran guided the usage of the technology. Once it was in their hands they dictated its usage. The people's ability to publicize the post-election events were dependent on the technologies available, but the guiding decisions as to how those technologies used and what they contained were entirely human.

The question posed for this assignment is a moral question in addition to being a tech question. Ethicists and academics will (if they haven’t already) struggle with this one for years to come. Essentially this is a shinier version of the chicken or the egg conundrum but today it is ultimately the user that guides the technology. At least until A.I. really takes over. . .

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Welcome!

Hello and welcome!
My name is Danny Weininger: aspiring Iranian Studies expert/major at the University of Maryland. In the coming weeks I will post items to this blog in an effort provide my [hopefully ever-growing] readership a little insight into the current situation in Iran and how technology has affected it. This is my first blog and I most definitely look forward to seeing where it goes. I will post many articles with some personal responses as well as my own commentary/reporting. My observations/opinions will be gleaned from an extensive list of many sources (conventional and unconventional): from American and Iranian online news sources (both print and broadcast); from sites like twitter and facebook; and perhaps most importantly from real life Iranians--friends and experts here on the U of Maryland campus. While this blog is part of a semester-long assignment for JOUR289I-Info 3.0, it is important to know I am very much so interested in this topic.

As this is the first week of blogging for the series it is important to establish something of a background just In case you haven't exactly been keeping your ear to the ground.

Here's a very, very bried intro: On June 12, 2009 Iranians voted in one of the most anticipated and contested presidential elections of the the Islamic Republic (IR). Four candidates ran-- incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Mehdi Karroubi, Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mohsen Rezai. The first and last of the four were considered the conservatives, while Karroubi and Mousavi were the moderate/liberal candidates. After polling across the country reported record turnout , Iranians seemed hopeful for a fair election. While skepticism existed among some voters that the government may attempt to fabricate votes it was not until a few hours after the polls closed when the landslide victory was in favor of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that outrage began. In the ensuing days and weeks millions of Iranians protested in the streets of cities large and small.

As the outrage poured into the streets it also poured into the internet thru raw video footage taken with camera phones and handheld devices. The videos showed peaceful protests; they showed beatings and murders as their broadcast was one of the most remarkable recordings of civil uprisings in recent history. Most importantly this display ushered in an new era of technological use. Here you can check out the Huffington Post's fantastic and live-updating coverage of the election/post-election. While amateur footage like this had previously found usage in places like CNN's iReport, brave Iranians became the reporters on the ground, as hundreds of foreign journalists were kicked out.

In my next post we'll get a little deeper look into the candidates, specifically Ahmadinejad, Mousavi, and Karroubi as it was these three that really utilized the internet and sought to tap the potential of their younger supporters.